Eurovision 2015: Does the running order matter?

by Pete Lewis 79 views4

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.

Each year in the build up to the final a lot of importance is placed on whether artists perform in the first or second half in the final, but is the running order influential as we believe?

Second half = success?

During the semi-final winners press conference we saw a number of artists show a somewhat pained or disappointed expression when they had chosen a first half slot, yet maybe that’s something they should’ve been celebrating.
Eight of the top ten were made up of songs from the first half including the winner, Sweden’s Måns Zelmerlöw.

Some may point out this was a year where an unprecedented number of the fan’s favourites drew the first half, but looking back at the last five years would suggest it wasn’t a one off.
Of the 50 songs that have reached a top ten placing in that time, 31 of those were from the first half of the show compared to just 19 in the second half.

Albeit, eight of the last ten winners performed in the second half of the grand final but the margins that a number of those winners won by would suggest that they’d have won regardless of what position they’d performed in.

‘Death Slots’

There are a few positions considered death slots in the final but none more so than 2nd in the running order.
The stats suggest that it isn’t a good place to be too. Six of the last ten songs to go on stage second ended the night either 20th or worse, with Dino Merlin bringing the position it’s only top ten finish (6th) in that time in 2011.

This is where we once again look at the quality of the songs. With the exception of Dino and perhaps Israel in 2009, none of the entries performing second were tipped to do well or were amongst the favourites so their lack of success isn’t the most surprising thing in the world.

Performing last is also seen as a bad omen amongst fans, some believe the audience’s interest would’ve faded somewhat having sat through over 20 songs.
Yet again, the stats say differently. The position has resulted in two bottom two finishes in the last ten years, but surprisingly yielded five top tens in that time including a third place for Italy’s Il Volo this year.

Quality over timing

Fans and media try and work out who wins and loses once the running order is released, but ultimately the biggest, and arguably the only, impact on the result are the quality of the song and performance on the night.

Your average song performing 19th in the final may well pick a point or two more than it would if it was performed 4th but there isn’t anything to suggest it would make an impactful difference on either end of the leader board.

There is no way of fully determining the true impact of the running order, but it is however clear that quality will always win out and a lack of it will always go unrewarded.

What do you think, what effect do you think the running order plays in the result?

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.
ESCToday is growing and always looks for new members to join our team! Feel free to drop us a line if you're interested! Use the Contact Us page or send us an email at vacancies@esctoday.com!
  • christine

    I don’t think its the running order, or the singing in the first or second half ! it all depends how much at stake do the judges have from the bookies ! you can have a super brilliant song ( ask IL VOLO!) voted 1st by millions to end up 6th by the Judges !! sorry lost all respect and trust in the jury, very disillusioned !!

  • eurovisiondreamer

    I totally agree… When you see it live, Sweden wasn’t really impressive WHATSOEVER… (nothing against Mans or Sweden) but the song is truly average and completely forgettable. I think the Jury didn’t really add to the show…

  • davve

    Sweden won fair and square. Heroes is a class act, Il Volos song is dated and just a operatic scream fest… Il Volos song has made no impact at international charts.

    Måns beat everyone by his performance on the final night.. and thank god for the jury who doesnt take into consideration media attention and running order……

    italy did not deserve to win with a dated and bland song

  • christine

    Well GRANDE AMORE not only won the televoting but also won the peoples’ hearts ! and the song has already has made a great impact all over Europe ! the judges did not judge the song at all they only took great consideration of their pockets and helping out the bookies by downgrading Italy’s song and made sure Sweden would win ! GRANDE AMORE is a powerful song sung by three very talented young singers with beautiful voices that many a singer in the festival and world wide would die for to have and was loved by young and old alike! I have nothing personal against Sweden or their singer but one thing came to mind……over a MILLION VOICES voted for GRANDE AMORE but It was IL VOLO who were the real HEROS on the Night